This week's offering was I suppose didactic in its way, in that we were taught something. But the teaching was more skilfully embedded in a work of art. We saw a man develop dementia, its effect on him and on his wife and daughter. We learnt something about the disease and about the human spirit. Descent by Linda Duncan McLaughlin was an excellent piece, very well performed and very moving.
I found Martyr, in which a young man spouts fundamentalist religious views by quoting from a holy book, rather irritating. But who would not be irritated by a constant stream of biblical quotations, for it's that holy book not the other one.
But it's a modern play from Germany and we don't see many of them so I tried hard to appreciate it. Unfortunately, and unlike the majority of critics I didn't.
It's about an hour's walk from my flat to the Modern Art Gallery via the Water of Leith but it's a pleasant way of stretching your legs provided it's not raining so that's the route I took to the Roy Lichtenstein exhibition the other day.
As I usually do when passing through Stockbridge I checked that my bell pull of fifty years ago had not been interfered with.
It's still resisting the winds of change as are those of the neighbours but a little tarnished looking. I'll have to take a tin of Brasso with me next time.
That would surprise the current occupiers.
There were a number of Lichtenstein works that were not the comic book images that I associate with him. They were stylistically similar though and I liked them. So much so that I lashed out three quid on some postcards which I have framed and added to my own little corridor gallery.
On the comic book image front there was something very interesting. The
gallery owns a piece called “In the Car” that they paid £100,000 for in 1980.
In a case in the room in which it was being displayed they had a copy of the image he used as a source. In the case there was also a quote from
Lichtenstein – “ My work is actually different from the comic strips in that
every mark is really in a different place, however slight the difference seems
to some. The difference is often not great, but it is crucial.”
I’m one of those to whom the differences seem slight and don’t seem to add £99,999.50 to what was probably the price of the comic. But there you are, that’s the mystery of art.
I’m one of those to whom the differences seem slight and don’t seem to add £99,999.50 to what was probably the price of the comic. But there you are, that’s the mystery of art.
This Wikipedia article has pictures of both the comic and the painting so judge for yourself. It also has the interesting information that another copy of the painting (a smaller one) was sold for $16.2 million ten years ago so it looks like our hundred grand was a good investment.